12 Now when Jesus heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew to Galilee. 13 He left Nazareth and made his home in Capernaum by the sea, in the territory of Zebulun and Naphtali, 14 so that what had been spoken through the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled:
Matthew 4:12-23
15 “Land of Zebulun, land of Naphtali,
on the road by the sea, across the Jordan, Galilee of the gentiles—
16 the people who sat in darkness
have seen a great light,
and for those who sat in the region and shadow of death
light has dawned.”
17 From that time Jesus began to proclaim, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.”
18 As he walked by the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea—for they were fishers. 19 And he said to them, “Follow me, and I will make you fishers of people.” 20 Immediately they left their nets and followed him. 21 As he went from there, he saw two other brothers, James son of Zebedee and his brother John, in the boat with their father Zebedee, mending their nets, and he called them. 22 Immediately they left the boat and their father and followed him.
23 Jesus went throughout all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the good news of the kingdom and curing every disease and every sickness among the people.
My sermon from the 3rd Sunday after Epiphany (January 25, 2026) on Matthew 4:12-23.
*******
So earlier this week, I co-lead the annual retreat for folks in the New Jersey synod who are currently in process to be ordained as a pastor or a deacon. And this year, 11 out of the 23 folks currently in what we call candidacy – as well as 8 members of the committee who walk with them – met at Camp Cross Roads for an overnight series of workshops and conversations about being “theological decision makers during times of chaos.” Now being a theological decision maker feels appropriate for every clergy person’s job description. Yet the practice of paying attention to our beliefs, what we put our trust into, and the words as well as actions revealing who we declare God to be isn’t only for the professionals. As members of the body of Christ, faith is already part of the decisions we make that influence us and the lives of others. I’ve often found, however, that doing theological decision-making isn’t something we always notice or see. This work is more than merely making a list of pros and cons, of being good, avoiding evil, and asking “what would Jesus do?” It’s also about admitting how our decisions are mostly just guesses based on limited bits of information, with all kinds of biases, that make no real guarantee over what tomorrow might bring. Even during the most peaceful of times, our decisions can be difficult, costly, and take a lot of time. It’s a process that, on one level, can feel a bit unfaithful since we often imagine decision-making should be like what we see in today’s reading from the gospel according to Matthew – sudden, forceful, and immediate. I wonder, though, if there might be another way to read this text that allows us to be imaginative, prayerful, and completely human.
And to do that, I’d like to highlight a decision that unfolds at the very beginning of this story. Jesus is, at this point in Matthew, finally an adult who was recently dunked into the Jordan River by John the Baptist. Then after hearing a voice from heaven declare him to be God’s beloved, Jesus went deeper into the wilderness where he was invited to be something other than who he was. Jesus, though, resisted these temptations and when the devil finally left him, angels nourished Jesus back to health. That’s where the story is at the end of verse 11 but when 12 starts, the political and religious situation within Jesus’ community had suddenly changed. John the Baptist was arrested by King Herod after John brought God’s word into a debate about who should have political power and who shouldn’t. It feels as if a lot has happened in a very short period of time between Jesus’ baptism and John’s arrest – as if everything is happening all at once. But I wonder if the immediacy we feel is more from how we read the story rather than from the words Matthew used. The transition from Jesus’ time with the angels to John’s arrest is pretty general. We’re not told today’s story began the next day or the next week or even the next month. Rather, all we know is Jesus heard John was arrested but not specifically when – or how. There’s no description of Jesus reading a newspaper, visiting a nearby marketplace for lunch, or opening his social media feeds to see what terrible thing the government had done that day. Even the assumption that Jesus’ divinity gave him some power to predict the immediate future isn’t explicitly named. Rather, what Matthew gave us is a gap of time where Jesus’ movement from being primarily the son of a carpenter to something else came to life. Rather than jumping out of the Jordan River to the pulpit, we got a Jesus who spent time wrestling with the thoughts, feelings, questions, and external forces that want us to be something other than kind, loving, and merciful humans God knows we can be. And after the news of state sponsored violence towards his friend came his way, he didn’t immediately toss over a few tables in the Temple. Jesus, instead, left the place he grew up in to root himself in a place where his new chapter could begin. And while we’re not told explicitly what went through Jesus’ head and heart during this time, Jesus’ theological decision-making took real effort and lasted a specific amount of time. We know Jesus’ way of decision-making is not like our own. Yet the wrestling, questioning, listening, and time it sometimes takes us to make a decision might be part of Jesus’ own experience too. And while we might wish our own decision making was much faster, resembling Simon, Andrew, James, and John when Jesus came to them while they were fishing, taking the time to wonder, to trust, and to notice where Jesus is leading us can be very faithful too.
And so practicing that process of decision-making was what we tried to do at our annual candidacy retreat. After a quick introduction once everyone showed up, a fine meal by the cooks at Cross Roads, and a few get-to-know each other games, we took real-life situations to explore what being an intentional theological decision-maker might look like. We invited Pastor Dan Whitener who teaches a course about “Case Studies in Lutheran ministry” at Princeton Theological Seminary to help us unpack the questions we should ask ourselves and our communities when symbols of civic power show up in places where we worship and pray. We then read the statement made earlier this month by our denomination’s presiding bishop Yehiel Curry pertaining to Venezuela and tried to reverse engineer the thoughts, questions, concerns, and faithful commitments that shaped the words he shared. As we pondered which kinds of questions matter more to us than others, those studying to be ordained pastors and deacons watched as members of the candidacy committee roleplayed what it’s like when, on Saturday night, something happens that makes us wonder if our sermons, children’s messages, prayers, and words might, or might not, need to change. And if that wasn’t enough, we then put everyone into small groups to practice their own process of theological decision-making with a variety of real world situations congregations in our synod have gone through. What might their process be if folks in their community started saying those showing up at their church’s food pantry didn’t actually look like they needed help or if questions about who is welcome at the Lord’s table and who isn’t bubbled up or if several families in the church were suddenly taken by ICE. Our focus wasn’t about coming up to a specific decision right then but rather letting an intentional faithful process of questioning ourselves, our communities, our world, and our God inform what we might do next. As human beings, our ability to be theological decision-makers will never be perfect and I trust we’ll always get things wrong way more often than we’ll get them right. But when the way forward looks murky, can we take the time to ask deep and challenging questions about the situation, accepting the fact we’re not experts about everything and we often can’t see all that needs to be seen? Can we invite others into our decision making process since our intent is less important than our impact? Can we let the Lutheran Christian commitments of love, grace, mercy, and being for one another show up more than our commitments to power, wealth, and status? Can we let God’s story be what interprets and reforms us rather than the cultural myths that surround us? And when the decision we need to make overwhelms us, can we focus our energy instead on one faithful step that shows how the kingdom of Heaven is already near? A Jesus who took the time to listen, to wonder, and to root himself somewhere new is the Jesus who invites us to let faith show up in all the decisions we make. But during those moments when time really is short and something must be said and done, it’s then when God’s decision to claim you as God’s own becomes what we cling to. And if Jesus is willing to be with you, to listen to you, to love, care, and show up for you with healing, mercy, sacrifice, and hope – then the decisions we make can – and should – always do the same. Amen.